Airbrush much? (13 photos)

… but “your sister megan” didn’t do these, did she?! i was wondering why someone would reduce the waist size on the 1st 3 pictures… it’s fucking ridiculous – “yeah, these girls are slim, but hey, let’s make them even slimmer”. wtf.

i don’t have a problem so much with brightening the skin tone and eyes but I do object to slimming down thighs and waists and pumping up breasts

Jennie- I do retouching with a NATURAL look. Not unnatural. For example, if someone wants to repair their photo or have a headshot retouched with more of a professional pop… that is where I come in RetouchFX.com — check it out!

Thank you! I hear ya… these photos are to the extreme.. which is why it is on SheChive — a hilarious photo blog

Belly Fatson really needed the retouching…

So much for wishing to look like that when I’m old…
Well, not like THAT, but as “perfectt.”

they actually made eva longoria’s arm larger

They make Kelly thinner, even though she’s not at all fat. They took away Beyonce’s tiny tummy skin. Perfect isn’t good enough!!

I must be weird, but in at least half the photos (with women) i prefer the original/before photo. Especially the first two, and the C. Diaz one.

I was watching Exiled once where one of the girls took a Cosmo to very primal Africa and one of the girls there asked if the models were real.

‘Nuf said.

see http://cbeau.ca/index.html

I understand erasing a pimple or a stray hair, etc. but who do they think they are slimming people’s waists/ thighs so drastically ? They also totally erased a face full of freckles! What the heck? I personally thought Cameron Diaz looked much hotter in the “before” photo. If it were me in those photos, I wouldn’t let them touch them. People need to know that these women they idolize are real people.

awesome..

They all look great in the before pictures! It’s too bad they get plasticized. I’d rather look at the “before” pictures in magazines. But that’s why I don’t read magazines.

Eva L.’s arm was fleshed out! They made her (straight) waist have a curve, but made her arm more healthy looking. I like Eva but, girl, eat some more food!

I understand fixing a picture up to make things look neater or brighter…but it’s so sad that they people. They got rid of Naomi Watts’ freckles, Cameron Diaz’s abs, that guy’s scars on his face… They shouldn’t change distinctive features, they become too generic and unrelatable

if any of you actually depended on your image being the source of your income, you would be saying things differently. and if people are dumb enough to idolise the image after it is retouched, they deserve what they get. the people behind the mask are not just pretty faces.

It’s ridiculous. I think that’s why some celebrities have such problems with self image. Imagine seeing your “altered” self plastered over all the magazines, etc. & then you go home & look in the mirror. It must be difficult for them to live up to their fake images. One good thing, tho, it keeps the airbrush artists working!

Cameron Diaz and Julia Styles look better without the amateur photoshop…

why are you not doing the dishes?

Why are the before shots much more attractive?

[...] si deseas ver mas fotos de famosos con retoques de photoshop. a2a_linkname="Imagenes famosos";a2a_linkurl="www.imagenesfamosos.com"; Posted in Famosos [...]

Its funny how they almost all look better prior to photoshop. What actually surprised me here is that you don’t even have to take a decent pic to be a photographer now, almost every before pic is pixelated way beyond any professional standard.

who is right below beyonce?

Not that it’s the only thing that was done, but a lot of these look better after because they are not as blurred as the before pictures and also some of the photos have some image adjustments like fixing the levels, contrast/saturation, etc. I wouldn’t consider those negative enhancements. It’d be more like making the photo more like it was actually suppose to appear. No appearance changing.