February 17, 2010 |
In: Beautiful, Celebrity, Photoshop, WTF
Follow Emily on Pinterest
Have you seen ‘Airbrush much?’ Click HERE to check it out!
[...] Les stars avec ou sans retouches Photoshop. [...]
This is just plain retarded.. some dumbass amateur photoshoped the "afters", and gives this out as fact.. you can clearly see that the afters SUCK.. each and every one is adjusted and has make up put on.. the make up doesn't even vary.. same formula for all..
5 bucks says some of the befores were also photoshopped to make them look a tad worse, so the *after* shots made more of an impact to the viewer.
oh—-and theyre not photoshopped worth a shit either…..
[...] コラから加工ミスまで。参考と反面教師に。 Celebs with no Photoshop is like Puff with no Ma$e (15 photos) Facebook… Literally Photoshop [...]
Exactly what MORON thought ***Dakota Fanning*** needs Photoshopping? (#10, I think that's Dakota) And as soon as we find out, can we have this person killed? Cruelly? Painfully? Also #11, much worse after than before, these women are mind-bendingly beautiful, people, you do NOT need to retouch them.
And you call this garbage an article? first your staff needs to do a decent photoshop job, because this is the most laughable and amateur photoshop I've seen in a LONG time…
Charlize is too much better without PS. She's gorgeous.
no big difference
No.10: A Photoshop disaster !!! Jezzz… she looks like a walking dead..
it is a total ruins compared to original.
megan's face is still the same… she's still pretty…..
Okay… I REALLY need to get photoshop!!!!
Dakota Fanning is beautiful and pretty even without photoshop!! I like
Ya , actually without photo shop or make ups actress are ugly as we have seen in above pics..
Thanks for the pics.
The Couple's Retreat one didn't just add Kali and Faizon at the last minute. Look at the other actors and actresses. Two totally different takes.
I think that all these women are beautiful without the photoshopping. I think sometimes we have too high of expectations of stars. The only one that is kind of freaky — is the first one of Madonna
All of these shoops look awful bar maybe two at most (Those two looking mediocre at best). Geez, increase the contrast and use a quick blur tool, overuse of the burn tool etcetera, poor skill at the liquify tool etc. etc. I'm only 18 and I can do much better than this. This gobshite should be sacked.. My God…
They are NOT without make up they changed the lighting that's all !!! With out make up means a clean face washed with soap and water then take a photo
Are you serious? Anyone can tell that these 'before' pictures are the final (probably already retouched) images and the 'after' images have been further reouched – poorly.
#13 Madonna – didn't know Madonna with a bit of photoshop was one of the Olsen twins. lol
11 looks retarded they made it look alot worse she looks like WAY older then she was
who really gives a shit
For the most part I think the "before" pics looked a ton better than the "after" pics. 4 I am debating on, but I think it probably looks better in the before. 12 needed better lighting, because she looks washed out in the first, so I guess the after looks a little better. 7 is the only one I really think looks better.
the only one who needs retouching is madonna. UGH
so why photoshop it If they are true hmanus they would say do not edit the photos but they are celebs they dont care about non of ya even when they help for good cause they just do it for publicity
Now I see that celebrities are not so perfect as we see on the screen.
this is bullshit, becouse in all pictures all of them look better than in photoshopped.
theBERRY.com on Facebook